Validity and Reliability of the Portuguese Version of Brief Motor Scale in Persons with Schizophrenia: A Preliminary Study

Authors

  • Susana Cristina Marques Guimarães Doctor Degree Student Researcher, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4033-5246
  • Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos Assistant Professor, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal; Centro de Estudos Educação Especial, Lisboa, Portugal; UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Lisboa, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6654-564X
  • Paula Lebre Auxiliary Professor, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8440-2415

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51338/rppsm.2020.v6.i3.160

Keywords:

Neurologic Manifestations, Psychomotor Performance, Reproducibility of Results, Schizophrenia

Abstract

Introduction: Neurological soft signs (NSS) indicate non‑specific cerebral dysfunction, those have been extensively documented in the clinical course of schizophrenia and have been considered as valuable symptoms to monitor the disorder. The Brief Motor Scale (BMS) has been widely used to assess motor neurological soft signs in patients with schizophrenia, but the Portuguese version is still unavailable. The aim of this study is the investigation of the validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the scale (BMS_pt).

Material and Methods: The International guidelines for the cross‑cultural process adaptation were considered. Forty three adults, between 23 to 63 years (39.74±11.16), 38 males and 5 females, with a diagnosis of schizophrenia participated in this study.

Results: Content validity indexes (> 0.75) pointed out the content validity of the BMS_pt with a moderate/strong agreement among experts. Internal consistency was confirmed, with Cronbach alphas ranging from 0.82 to 0.87. Pearson correlations ranged from 0.93 and 0.99 (p<0.01). Exploratory Factorial Analysis resulted in a two‑factor model that explained 58.91% of total variance

Conclusion: Results showed that all BMS_pt items are relevant. BMS_pt seems to be a valid and reliable instrument to assess motor NSS in individuals with schizophrenia with the potential to be used in rehabilitation services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington: APA; 2013.

Kahn RS, Sommer IE, Murray RM, Meyer‑Lindenberg A, Weinberg DR, Cannon TD, et al. Schizophrenia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15067. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.67.

Janssens S, Moens H, Coppens V, Vandendriessche F, Hulstijn W, Sabbe B, et al. Psychomotor assessment as a tool to differentiate schizophrenia from other psychotic disorders. Schizophr Res. 2018;200:92‑98. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.047.

Docx L, Sabbe B, Fransen E, Bervoets C, Wouter H, Bossche M, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of the psychomotor syndrome in schizophrenia. J Neuropsych Clin Neurosci. 2014;26:359‑68. doi: 10.1176/APPI.NEUROPSYCH.13020027.

Hirjak D, Thomann P, Kubera K, Wolf N, Sambataro F, Wolf R. Motor dysfunction within the schizophrenia‑spectrum: A dimensional step towards an underappreciated domain. Schizophr Res. 2015;169:217‑33. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.10.022.

Morrens M, Hulstijn W, Sabbe B. Psychomotor Slowing in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bul. 2007;33:1038–53. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl051.

Neelam K, Garg D, Marshall M. A systematic review and meta‑analysis of neurological soft signs in relatives of people with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:1‑8. doi : 10.1186/1471‑244X‑11‑139.

Pitzianti M, Pontillo M, Vicari S, Armando M, Pasini A. 22q11 microdeletion syndrome and ultra‑high risk for psychosis: The role of neurological soft signs as an independent marker of vulnerability for psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;13:1191‑8.

doi: 10.1111/eip.12754.

Bombin I, Arango C, Buchanan R. Significance and meaning of neurological signs in schizophrenia: two decades later. Schizophr Bull. 2005;31:962–77. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbi028.

Jahn T, Cohen R, Hubmann W, Mohr F, Köhler I, Schkenker R, et al. The Brief Motor Scale (BMS) for the assessment of motor soft signs in schizophrenic psychoses and other psychiatric disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2006;142:177‑89. doi: 10.4103/0019‑5545.94653.

Zakaria H, Jaafar N, Baharudin A, Ibrahim N, Midin M. Motor neurological soft signs among patients with schizophrenia: a clinical evidence. Sains Malays. 2013;42:381‑8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00145.

Guilera G, Gómez‑Benito J, Pino O, Rojo J, Cuesta M, Martínez‑Arán A, et al. Utility of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2012;138:240‑7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.031.

Dazzan P, Murray R. Neurological soft signs in first‑episode psychosis: a systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;181:s50‑7.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.181.43.s50.

Chan R, Xu T, Heinrichs R, Yu Y, Wang Y. Neurological soft signs: a meta‑analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:1089‑104.

doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp011

Filatova S, Koivumaa‑Honkanen H, Hirvonen N, Freeman A, Ivandic I, Hurtig I, et al. Early motor developmental milestones and schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Schizophr Res. 2017;188:13‑20. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.01.029.

Pedroso V, SalgadoJ, Teixeira A. Sinaisneurológicossutis: uma revisão. J Bras Psiq. 2010;59:233‑7. doi: 10.1590/

S0047‑20852010000300010.

Bachmann S, Degen C, Geider F, Schröder J. Neurological Soft Signs in the Clinical Course of Schizophrenia: Results of a Meta‑Analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2014;5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00185.

Zao Q, Ma Y, Lui S, Liu W, Xu T, Yu X, et al. Neurological soft signs discriminate schizophrenia form major depression but on bipolar disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;43:72‑8. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.12.006.

Walther S, Strik W. Motor Symptoms and Schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatry. 2012; 66:77‑92. doi: 10.1159/000339456.

Guimarães S, Santos S, Lebre P. Os sinais neurológicos motores discretos em pessoas com esquizofrenia e a sua contribuição na intervenção psicomotora. Psicomotricidade. 2016;19:106‑28.

Buchanan R, Heinrichs D. The neurological evaluation scale (NES): A structured instrument for the assessment of neurological signs in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 1989;27:335‑50. doi: 10.1016/0165‑1781(89)90148‑0.

Schröder J, Niethammer R, Geider F, Reitz C, Binkert B, Jauss M, et al. Neurological soft signs in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1991;6:25‑30. doi: 10.1016/0920‑9964(91)90017‑l.

Chen E, Shapleske J, Luque R, McKenna P, Hodges J, Calloway S, et al. The Cambridge neurological inventory: a clinical instrument of soft neurological signs and the further neurological examination for psychiatric patients. Psychiatry Res. 1995;56:183‑204.

Sá M. Análise do padrão motor em pessoas com diagnóstico de esquizofrenia: uma abordagem em tempo real [dissertation]. Porto: Escola Superior de Tecnologias da Saúde do Porto; 2013.

Martins I, Lauterbach M, Luís H, Amaral H, Rosenbaum G, Slade P, et al. Neurological subtle signs and cognitive development: a study in late childhood and adolescence. Child Neuropsychol. 2012;19:466‑78. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2012.693911.

Jahn T, Hubmann W, Karr M, Mohr F, Schlenker R, Heidenreich T, et al. Motoric neurological soft signs and psychopathology symptons in schizophrenic psychoses. Psychiatry Res. 2006;142:191‑9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2002.12.003.

Santos S, Lebre P, Moniz‑Pereira L. Human Functioning and Rehabilitation Research: different ways to look at the conceptual model. In: Alves F, Rosado A, Moniz‑Pereira L, Araújo D, editors. Research on Human Kinetics – Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Cruz Quebrada: Edições FMH; 2018. p. 215‑24.

Probst M, Knapen J, Poot G, Vancampfort D. Psychomotor therapy and psychiatry: what’s in a name?. Open Complem Med J. 2010;2:105‑13.

Varambally S, Venkatasubramanian G, Gangadhar B. Neurological soft signs in schizophrenia – The past, the present and the future. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012;54:73–80. doi: 10.4103/0019‑5545.94653.

Morais A, Santos S, Lebre P. Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese Version of the Examen Gerontopsychomoteur.

Educ Gerontol. 2016;42:516‑27. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2016.1165068.

Santos S, Morato P, Luckasson R. Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese Version of the Adaptive Behavior Scale. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;52:379‑87. doi: 10.1352/1934‑9556‑52.5.379.

Yaghmaie F. Content Validity and its Estimation. J Med Educ. 2003;3:25‑7.

Polit D, Beck C. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:489–97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.

International Test Commission. The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). 2017.[accessed Jan 2020] Available from: http://www.InTestCom.org

Wynd C, Schmidt B, Schaefer M. Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res. 2003;25:508–18. doi: 10.1177/0193945903252998.

Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales ‑ A practical guide to their development and us. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

Viera A, Garrett J. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–3.

Pestana M, Gageiro J. Análise de dados para ciências sociais: A complementaridade do SPSS. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo; 2005

Nunnally J. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw‑Hill; 1978.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Marques Guimarães, S. C., Santos, A. S. P. G. dos, & Lebre, P. (2020). Validity and Reliability of the Portuguese Version of Brief Motor Scale in Persons with Schizophrenia: A Preliminary Study. Revista Portuguesa De Psiquiatria E Saúde Mental, 6(3), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.51338/rppsm.2020.v6.i3.160

Issue

Section

Original article